PRISTINE-ENGLISH! What is different about it?




What is different about it?












The print version of this book is available from http://imojo.in/8myliy and from https://www.createspace.com/6637977







Aaradhana, DEVERKOVIL 673508 India


[email protected] Contact: Telegram/Whatsapp: 91 9656100722


PRINT VERSION: The printed versions of all my books are available on CreateSpace. For more information, please send a message via Telegram Messenger: @VICTORIA_INSTITUTIONS

This is a book which I developed by posting chapters on Telegraph.UK blog pages. The first chapter was posted on the 27th of May 2014.


It was part of my desperate attempts to inform the naive, gullible and stupid Englanders of what is dangerously different in most other languages, which have feudal or three-Dimensional word-code structure.


Without any information on this most powerful evilness, the nation is singing praise and glory to its misinformed national policy of multi-culture.


Even though the subject matter that I have dealt in here would be quite easy for any feudal language speaker to understand, it would not be easy for a native-English speaker to grasp.


Most native-feudal language speakers who are currently enjoying the quaint splendour of England would shy away from admitting the correctness in my writings. For, if they do admit that there is a very powerful content in this, all their outraged contentions on English racism would evaporate into thin air.


This writing is part of my efforts that started a few decades back, starting with my first book on this theme: March of the evil empires: English versus the feudal languages. I see that most or all of my misgivings on what would come upon pristine-native-English nations, when feudal language speakers swarm in, has more or less come true, or are coming true.

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. 1. Planar language

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. 2. Software of language

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. 3. Arranging human attributes

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. 4. Engaging the gears inside the vice-like grip

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. 5. Communicating across the canyons

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. 6. EQUALITY and FREEDOM in a Slotted Social Space

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. 7. Respect versus pejoratives

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. 8. Social flight if seclusion is not possible

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. 9. Satanism in language codes

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. 10. A candid view of the uncanny outside Part1

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. 11. A candid view of the uncanny outside Part2

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. 12. A candid view of the uncanny outside Part3

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. 13. Inserting codes of control & subordination in individuals

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. 14. Codes of incessant belligerence

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. Books by the VED from VICTORIA INSTITUTIONS

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. Planar language

I introduce myself as an independent researcher on language codes, codes of reality and such thing. I have written around 10 books, almost all of them having either direct connection to these themes or at least an allusion. My first book in this genre of writing was March of the Evil Empires; English versus the feudal languages. It was first drafted in 1989, developed over the years and finally published as a digital book in the beginning years of the 2000s. I understand that most of what I portended with regard to what is going to happen to English nations has come true. Much to my own mental disquiet.

All my books are available for free download on archive.org. Paid versions are also available, but with no major difference.

Over the years my understanding of the subject matter has grow much. At present, it is even much beyond what I mentioned in my latest book: Shrouded Satanism in feudal languages. It has reached a level where I can literally touch the specific codes and speak of the various triggers that are there in them.

What is different about English?

Over the years, and beyond, of singular observations, study and intuitive thinking, I have come to the conclusion that both England as well as English are, or at least had been, totally different from most other nations and languages. Note the word most.

Sitting inside England, and seeing others speak English with quite fabulous precision and capacity, one may not understand that the world outside is quite different.  There is indeed a great deal of difference between English and most other languages. This in turn creates the difference that England has with other nations, in varying degrees of differences.

What I am going to say here may not really be new information to most people who are of non-English nativity. However, this might be a piece of information that may not be welcome, for it has the potential to trigger the opening up innumerable themes, all of which are intimately connected to codes in languages, and what they trigger in the human world.

Vertical positioning of human beings, and how words can sharply shift them up and down

The theme is quite big and needs a very small and yet, quite focused beginning, as a first step.

Look at these sentences.

He is a good man.

He is an honourable man.
He is an honest man.

When one views these sentences from English, the powerful adjective that adorns the man is words like ‘good, ‘honourable’, ‘honest’ etc. However, in most other languages, which I have over the years defined as ‘feudal languages’, this is a part of the sentence that does not have much social significance.  [Retrospectively speaking, I think the usage ‘feudal language’ may not exactly describe the meandering effect of these languages. However some more than twenty years back, this was the only description that I could come up with.]

For example, in the languages of the Indian peninsular region, the adjectives of ‘good’, ‘honest’, ‘honourable’ etc. are not what define the person. The exact codes of social eminence is embedded in the word ‘He’.

Or, it can be ‘she’, ‘you’, ‘they’ and such other words. With the same context.

What is different here is that there are different levels of each word.


‘ You’ Grade +ve (single positive)  Thangal താങ്കള്‍ (South Indian)

‘You’ Grade Neutral                        Ningal നിങ്ങള്‍  (South Indian)

‘You’ Grade –ve (single negative) Nee    നി           (South Indian)

There can be double or even triple positives to the heights, and double or even triple negatives to the depths.

Also there can be minor shades of positives or negatives in-between these grades.

This grading more or less mentions a person’s total social eminence, or any other connected thing; in each and every conversation or mention of that person. [And this social elevation or depreciation is what envelopes an individual or a group of individuals, and almost everything else connected to them.]

Similar grading is there for the other words I have mentioned. That is, for He, She, They &c.

Now, look at the sentence I have mentioned:

He is a good man.

In feudal languages, this sentence is every time in one of the forms given below:

He (–ve) is a good man.  [double negative]

He (-ve) is a good man. [single negative]   [‘He’ is ‘avan‘] Dirt level/lower level

He (neutral) is a good man. [equal]             [‘He’ is ‘ayaal‘] Equal or lower

He (+ve) is a good man. [single positive]    [‘He’ is adheham‘} Superior, Great, ennobled

He (++ve) is a good man. [double positive]

Actually, there is a very powerful and satanic segmentation of human personality, dignity, attributes, self confidence, and right to dignified stature, right to articulation, and every other right, and so many other things that happens when this sentence is spoken in a feudal language.  The segmentation is to various levels starting from that of

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. Utter dirt, wherein absolute vulnerability to deep encroachment is defined in the codes. There is no protection. At this level, the individual has no rights whatsoever. It is acknowledged by the individual. If not, he shows criminal levels of impertinence which will be stamped out brutally.

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. Slight level of dirt, wherein a slight amount of human dignity is acknowledged along with acceptable suppression and distaste encoded in the communication.

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. This is the level of neutrality, in which the other person is seen, addressed, or referred to as an equal. This can be a degrading stance if the person who does the mention is a lower person. And an upgrading, if the person who does the mention is a relative upper person. Or this can be a temporary stance, before the forceful upward or downward shifting of the other person is done.

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. This is the level of admitting that the other man is a relatively better person, in certain attributes.

p(((((<>{color:#000;background:#fff;}. This is the level of attributing absolute divinity to the other person.

Bear in mind that a single word can pull an individual from one slot and powerfully insert him in another slot.  The Who’[+ ][+who does it also adds]a powerful component into the effect.

The terror and the relief

Everyone in the social system craves for this strange level of adjective value addition, and not for the other adjective at the right end. It is clear that the codes mentioned here are totally at variance from that in traditional English.

It is a very savage endeavour that is acted out to attain this value elevation. Every means, crooked and worse, can be done. For, at the end, it means the elevation in the codes, which is a very secure state of living. The other elevation like ‘honourable’, ‘honest’, ‘decent’, ‘trustworthy ’ &c. are of  totally feeble worth. In fact, they have no worth if the left-end code value is not there.  There is a terror of words, and what they can achieve.

The effect of the codes is also connected to what is theexact level of the person who does the speaking, the exact level of the person who is the target of the speech, and to the exact levels of the persons who hear the speech.   Each word can create positive inserting of value, or tumultuous pulling down, or even that of self depreciation to accommodate the other person’s elevation. Carefully chosen words can pluck a person from one slot and place him in another, forcefully. Words are quite powerful.  There is a terror of the lower man. He stands on a diabolic degraded platform, from where he can push an individual to relative heights, or pull him to abominable levels below.

The difficulty of conveying the information

I am using a single model here to describe what a ‘feudal language’ is. However, a single model cannot illustrate the features of the total complexity of the effect of the feudal codes.

One major problem is the narrow domains of English words. There are actually no equivalent words in English for the various words and usages in feudal languages. Feudal languages do have a beastliness, or savagery that cannot be translated into English. Neither can the beauty in them be brought into English.

However, if I were to explain the subject in my own native feudal language, a minor numbers of words can inform the reader what I alluding to.

It is like saying: The lion said, ‘Roar’! Actually what the lion said is not ‘roar’, but a totally terrifying sound. However, the words in the lion’s ‘roar’ cannot be mentioned in English. Similarly the melodious beauty of the howling of the jackals can be sensed only by the beasts who can understand the words in them.

To convey to a native-English speaker the exact effect of a feudal language, I might need to use a lot of mutually unconnected models. Many of them may not be in sync with each other.

The effects

It is not possible to convey to a native-English speaker the difference feudal language codes makes.  Everything about human beings, human social interaction, and social and professional communication is affected by this extremely powerful change in the structure of language codes. [+ Human beings get arranged in a vertical manner+]. A weird kind of inequality that English cannot envisage will be there when such languages get spoken. A kind of towering individuals on the higher sides, and individuals soiled with squalor on the other end.  An innate repulsiveness to certain individuals and craving to be with certain others, built up. Not connected to any positive qualities like good looks, refinements, manners etc., but towards savage clout.

The codes in the software

Language is a software.  Not only for communication, but for various other things. However, for the average English native, language is only a software for communication. He or she wouldn’t know of the very powerful codes that various other communication software (languages) hold within themselves.

Since I have not gone through the various other languages around the globe, I cannot vouch for the fact that they all hold feudal codes within them. However, from a perfunctory examination of the languages of the Indian peninsular region, I am sure that most of them do have this within them. It is possible that most African and even South American native languages do have them. As to Europe, many, not all, of them do have similar codes in them to some extent. This is my intuitive feeling based on a cursory study of the various social systems, and their histories.

No common location in English

Now, I need to mention that when I speak of the various hierarchical levels of arrangement of human beings, as denoted above, the native English speaker might quite easily try to find some similarity to such English usages as Thou, Thee, Thy etc. I can categorically say that this is not the thing that I am mentioning. If anyone tries to insert any comparison with them, standing on this side of the fence, I can only say that it is a mischievous stance, which only aims to bring in disarray to this dissertation.

The non-tangible routes

I need to say that the diabolic codes in feudal languages do have a lot of inner links that works on and   preys upon various human attributes.  And inserts controls and routes to human behaviour. In a most non-tangible manner.

Such things as non-tangible routes of loyalties  (familial, social, national &c.), need to be  cunning & suppressive, use affability/warm hospitality as a weapon of conquest, build up megalomaniacal mental postures, practise rudeness as an effective tool for adding positive values to personal attributes, callous cruelty to lower beings, both human as well as animals, and most other social codes which one can usually find in oriental, African and some European social systems traditionally, are quite visibly encoded in these languages.  When they get enacted out in English nations, there can be break down of systems, brooding anger, unseen triggers to terrible bursts of violence and much else.

The planar levelling in English, and the oscillation back

When one speaks English, in its most pristine form, (pristine English of England of yesteryears), there is a total change of human personality. It is seen reflected in the social scene and in the social communication. For, human beings get pulled into a planar level, from their innate locations of various elevations in a 3-dimensional virtual arena.  Most of the treacherous moods get erased or even become unnecessary.

However, when persons shift back to their native languages, there is a sharp and explosive rearranging of social components, the most significant of which are the human beings present therein. England can shift to shifty designs, when this happens.

In fact, feudal languages do have powers akin to what may be described as that of Witchcraft, Black magic, Tantra and such things.

A total change of social structure and social behaviour can be enacted by a mere change of language, and of word codes within it.

This is an exposition on languages codes and their effects on human beings. There is no need to equate it with racism or ethnic repulsions. I am neither white nor English. I am reasonably well-read in English, and also quite good in my own native feudal language.

There is a lot more to mention. To be continued…………..


h1<>{color:#283D4B;}. Software of language

Language is a software. All languages are software. Each has its own ways and manners. Each one of them creates a social communication system which is characteristic of the codes inside it.

Now how do I prove that language is a software? And what all things can this software do? Well, in my ancient book March of the evil empires; English versus the feudal languages, I had mentioned the various things that a language can accomplish and what it contains. Languages do contain the design of the society it creates. It can also define the looks or the physical attributes of a human being who speaks that language. However, it may be mentioned here that most languages are not planar ones like English. They are structured, hierarchical and feudal. So they can implant different kinds of looks and facial demeanours on to the human being depending on his or her location in the language codes. This statement may not be easily understood in English, for it is a planar language. And what I proposed is about 3-dimensional virtual code languages.

I aim to show the codes in the languages, and how they work.  On human beings, human behaviour, human looks, physical development, events, social design, emotional triggers and much else. [Please note that each of the words I give has a very specific meaning. They are not simply an arraying of dictionary words as one would find in ludicrous academic textbooks].

Before embarking on this venture, I would like to mention a particular proposition which might look quite preposterous. It is that reality does have a code view and a design view apart from the material reality view. Actually, I can continue my path towards explaining the language codes without this apparent digression. However, it might be good to mention the area of impact of the language codes beforehand. For, it might help to gather a better understanding.

Not only reality, but even human beings do have a code and design view arena.

For those readers who cannot understand the terms code view and design view, I am giving this minor input. (At my level of requirement).

I am posting the three versions of a page in my website.

First Real Webpage

Second: the Design View

Third: the Code View

One can design the website and make changes into it by simply moving or pulling or inserting items into the Design View.

However, if one knows to work with the codes, a more powerful control and design mechanism can be activated.

Whatever change one does in the Design View, makes a corresponding change in the codes. And also vice versa.

That human body has a code view has been confirmed by me by experimenting with homeopathic medicines. In fact, I had proposed that a medical system that works in the Code View can rectify many human disease conditions. Homeopathic medicines do work with some kind of code values, in the same way that words and language codes work. I have not heard of any homeopathic doctor explaining clearly how homoeopathy works.  Yet, it does work.

I have written a book titled: Codes of Reality; What is Language?

There is another book of mine titled: Software codes of Reality, Life and Languages! This book more or less was disconnected writings on the various thoughts that appeared in my mind before I wrote Codes of Realty; What is Language?

[My latest book of this genre is: [* Software codes of mantra, tantra, witchcraft, black magic, evil eye, evil tongue &c *].]

However, my understanding of the theme is currently beyond what I have already written. Yet, the books might be interesting to persons who have the time and inclination to read them.

This much I wrote to make a background to my further writing.

Codes in Languages

Background of the author: The theme is quite complicated. And it has a lot of parameters, sides, proposals and such things. It is not possible to mention everything together. When I speak one item, it may seem that it contradicts some other commonly known information.  I can explain the other contradiction only when I reach that point. Readers are requested to bear in mind that the writer is quite sincere and has immense information in the theme that is being expounded here. My native language is a South Asian language. I have been making observations about language codes since the very dawn of my life. If anyone wants to check the veracity of the claims to information on a particular aspect of languages, that is the effect of language codes, I would request them to read this bit of prediction that came in my book(3 paragraphs) March of the evil empires; English versus the feudal languages . This book was written in a particularly hurried or even harried phase of my life. So, the book couldn’t maintain its readability quality after some 50 or so pages.

Actually, I would like to speak about the fact that all living beings do communicate in some language. May be not spoken. It can even benon-verbal. Or it might be as a blue-tooth or WiFi device communicates. Yet, there would be a language, with its own codes. I do know that animals like dogs do have languages, which might be common. I do not want to digress into that.

What is generally not known by people who speak planar languages like English, is that in 3-diamensional languages words, usages, names &c. do have a  direction code andtrigonometric component of force attached. I do not want to go into that item here.

I would like to speak about the sound of language. Even though, Englishmen may not know it, the fact is that different languages do have different sounds. It is not an issue of not understanding a language. It is that lions roar is a language, and dog’s barking is a language, in the similar way that Tamil is a language, and Spanish is a language, and so is English. Each has different sounds. Some are pleasing to the ears. Some irritate, some bring in fear, some creates acreepy feeling and some make can rouse up emotions. This part of the discussion also, I will leave out for the time being.

If language is a software, entry of a language into a social system can be allowed only after making it undergo a complete virus scan. Otherwise, the social system would slowly start exhibiting errors, violence, and emotional outburst, senseless killings, slowing down of processes, disintegration, and also mental problems.  There are many more to be mentioned.  Please note that the arraying of words I do here are not aimed at adorning this article. Each item has a meaning and has a reality scene that is connected to it.

When 3-dimensional language (which I earlier defined erroneously as feudal language) social system impact with a planar language social system, it is a collision of two totally two different designs. Like a planar world impacting into a 3-dimensional world. The items in the planar world would get thrown into various locations in a very weird manner of the 3-dimensional world.

This exactly is what is happening when English nations get impacted into 3-dimensional language social systems. At the same time, on the other side, the various components in the 3-dimensional system would experience a forced moving into a planar level. This is the effect of English into feudal language social systems like that in the social systems of Indian peninsular region, and elsewhere.

I think I have created the necessary background to move ahead. However, I need to caution that I have to take up the theme in a very simple manner. Otherwise, the native-English speaker would get no head or tail of what is being propounded.

I cannot go after every explanation. For instance, when I say He, there is She, They, We, You &c. And when I say Was, there is Were also. Like that for every sample word, there would be other variation. And their allied connected variations. I would not go after them. For, if I do the subject matter may move at a very slow pace.

On to the Software

Think of an individual. He.

This He is connected to the past, present and future, through words.


He was

He has been

He had been

He used to

He did

He could have

He would have

He should have


Visit: http://www.Shakespir.com/books/view/671809 to purchase this book to continue reading. Show the author you appreciate their work!

PRISTINE-ENGLISH! What is different about it?

This book is part of my desperate attempts to inform the naive, gullible and stupid Englanders of what is dangerously different in most other languages, which have feudal or three-Dimensional word-code structure. Without any information on this most powerful evilness, the nation is singing praise and glory to its misinformed national policy of multi-culture. Most native-feudal language speakers who are currently enjoying the quaint splendour of England would shy away from admitting the correctness in my writings. For, if they do admit that there is a very powerful content in this, all their outraged contentions on English racism would evaporate into thin air. This writing is part of my efforts that started a few decades back, starting with my first book on this theme: March of the evil empires: English versus the feudal languages. I see that most or all of my misgivings on what would come upon pristine-native-English nations, when feudal language speakers swarm in, has more or less come true, or are coming true. It is a dismal awareness.

  • ISBN: 9781370534418
  • Author: Ved from Victoria Institutions
  • Published: 2016-10-12 08:50:13
  • Words: 29079
PRISTINE-ENGLISH! What is different about it? PRISTINE-ENGLISH! What is different about it?